California Court Blocks Blackjack Ban in Cardrooms

Judge Halts Controversial Regulations

California cardrooms will be allowed to continue offering blackjack and other popular table games after a court ruled that the state’s Department of Justice lacked the authority to introduce new restrictions targeting player-dealer games.

Legal Challenge Delivers Victory for Operators

The legal action was led by the California Gaming Association alongside two cardroom organizations seeking to stop the rules before their planned implementation this month.

Among the proposed changes was a requirement preventing cardrooms from using the name "blackjack" or referencing the number 21, while also eliminating the traditional concept of players "busting" after exceeding 21 points.

Court Questions DOJ Authority

On Tuesday, San Francisco Superior Court Judge Richard Darwin ruled from the bench in favor of the cardrooms, temporarily blocking the regulations and handing the industry a significant victory.

The parties are expected to return to court next week, when the judge will issue a full written ruling explaining the decision.

Industry Warned of Economic Impact

The California Gaming Association welcomed the outcome, arguing that the ruling confirms the Bureau of Gambling Control's role is to enforce existing laws rather than create new ones.

Association president Kyle Kirkland described the decision as providing a "clear answer" on the limits of the agency's authority. "The court's ruling is a lifeline for communities across California."

Kirkland warned that the regulations could have harmed local economies and reduced funding for public services supported by cardroom tax revenues, including police departments, parks, libraries and youth programs.

Attorney General's Office Reviewing Options

The association also renewed criticism of the proposed rules, claiming they were designed to benefit tribal gaming operators at the expense of cardrooms.

A spokesperson for Attorney General Rob Bonta's office said it was "disappointed" with the decision and is currently reviewing its legal options.

Meanwhile, the California Nations Indian Gaming Association, which supported the proposed regulations, had not publicly commented on the ruling at the time of publication.