Current Ukrainian legislation places significant limitations on gambling advertising, leaving licensed operators with limited visibility opportunities. By contrast, illegal operators continue to promote their services without adhering to regulatory constraints, creating competitive imbalance within the market.

A Framework That Allows Responsible Visibility

Despite the broader advertising ban, Ukrainian law permits licensed gambling companies to sponsor sporting events — excluding children’s and youth sports. Operators are allowed to support professional sports teams, athletes, competitions and broadcasts, using their trademarks within this defined framework.

This exception is widely viewed as a pragmatic regulatory solution. Rather than imposing a blanket prohibition, the legislation differentiates between general public events and professional sports, where sponsorship can be structured, transparent and aligned with responsible gaming standards.

Such segmentation provides legal operators with legitimate channels for brand visibility while maintaining restrictions designed to protect vulnerable groups.

Moving Beyond “Total Prohibition”

Industry stakeholders argue that excessive prohibitions can unintentionally weaken the regulated market. When legal operators are restricted from standard promotional tools, they may struggle to compete with unlicensed platforms that operate without oversight. In turn, this can impact tax revenues, market development and consumer protection.

The sports sponsorship model demonstrates that regulation does not need to equate to prohibition. Instead, clearly defined parameters within specific segments can preserve business opportunities while ensuring compliance and oversight.

Expanding the Balanced Approach

Experts suggest that this logic could be extended to other strictly professional environments, such as industry conferences, exhibitions and round tables dedicated to the gambling sector. International events like ICE, one of the largest global gatherings for the gaming industry, illustrate how sponsorship within a specialized, adult, business-focused context can operate without targeting vulnerable audiences.

If similar events were hosted in Ukraine, proponents argue that licensed domestic operators should be allowed to participate as sponsors under regulated conditions, reinforcing transparency and industry development.

A Path Toward Sustainable Market Growth

The Ukrainian case highlights a broader regulatory principle: effective oversight is built not on multiplying bans, but on rational segmentation. By combining strict consumer protection with controlled avenues for legal promotion, authorities can foster a competitive and compliant gambling ecosystem.

As Ukraine continues refining its gambling framework, the sports sponsorship exception stands as a positive example of balanced policymaking — one that supports economic development while safeguarding social responsibility.